The Iran deal from the start never said, hey, stop everything.
So, so many are quick to say that President Donald Trump has made a horrible error in withdrawing from the 2015 Iranian nuclear accord, and some of their doubts are understandable even as the definitive harrumph is nonsense.
The fact is, Trump kept pushing Iran to exhibit peaceful intent, but it did not, and we are therefore in a situation where its continuing evil is ever more a real peril even if that peril unseen by those who do not want to see.
Iran has been moving ahead to build nuclear weapons. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu demonstrated as much with 100,000 hidden Iranian documents that Israel found. Critics yawn, but some of those documents showed the Iranian government’s determination to roll ahead with its weaponizing ambition, if at a slower pace.
The Iran nuclear deal from the start never said, hey, stop everything. It just said quit doing as much as you were. It let Iran keep its nuclear infrastructure and keep enriching uranium, if not by as much. It also said that Iran could still shoot off those ballistic missiles, which are obviously meant to transport nukes someday.
All of these appeasement nods would somehow work out, the Barack Obama team said at the time of the deal, because we would build better relations with Iran over time and we’ve got a good inspection regime. According to deal supporters, Iran has majestically lived up to every promise.
False, false and false. Instead of geniality, what we’ve received from Iran are threats to wipe out Israel, the harassment of the U.S. military to the point of taking hostages, and a bloody, terroristic presence in the Middle East meant to say Iran would soon be in murderous control.
The Iranians have at least a day to prepare for any inspection, and inspectors are denied any access at all to particularly suspect military bases that Britain, France and Germany agree should be looked at. As for compliance with the deal, consider some 32 illicit efforts to get foreign technology that have nuclear weaponry implications, at least as reported by a German intelligence agency.
President Obama said the only alternative to the weak-kneed Iran nuclear deal was war, and some Trump critics have said his abandonment of the deal could send Iran scurrying to get its nukes, something that would now take about a year as compared to maybe three months before the deal.
The thing is, some of the other six countries involved in this are making billions through trade with Iran, and for that reason and others, want to keep their part of the deal intact.
So does Iran because, instead of taking returned billions and putting them into its economy, it put them into military buildup and support of terrorism. The economy is collapsing, strikes are happening, outright rebellion could be in the offing, and the regime could be in peril without that trade.
Because of a return of U.S. financial sanctions, none of this will be nearly as profitable on either side as before, however, and Iran may just finally decide that it had better heed some of what Trump wants.
Consider that the Obama deal was comparable to President Bill Clinton’s nuke deal with North Korea — all talk, little action — and then consider how Trump’s tough stance is just maybe working with North Korea. Ponder how North Koreans recently released three American prisoners as a prelude to talks, while the Iranians released no American prisoners until Obama provided a ransom that he and confused supporters said was not a ransom.
Some good has come out of the Iranian deal, such as Iran sending Russia much of its super-enriched uranium while getting all kinds of natural uranium back, but it was Obama who facilitated the U.S. departure.
Contrary to the Constitution which he promised to “preserve, protect and defend,” Obama did not get a required treaty that the Senate would have to ratify, but a deal Trump could easily break. But just maybe improve, too.
Jay Ambrose is a columnist with Tribune News Service. Reach him at email@example.com.