North Topsail Beach Mayor Daniel Tuman testified earlier this month before a House Natural Resources subcommittee in support of H.R. 187.


North Topsail Beach Mayor Daniel Tuman testified earlier this month before a House Natural Resources subcommittee in support of H.R. 187. The Town of North Topsail Beach has been working with Congressman Walter B. Jones (and Senator Kay Hagan – who has introduced a companion bill in the Senate) to correct a decades-old federal mapping error that wrongly prohibited a significant portion of North Topsail Beach from accessing the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and other Federal programs. In 1982, the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) – enacted to discourage development of previously undeveloped U.S. coastal areas – incorrectly classified most of the northern part of North Topsail Beach as “undeveloped,” thus making the area ineligible to access the NFIP. Congressman Jones’ bill would replace the existing CBRA map with an accurate one.



Mayor Tuman testified that the Town previously submitted sufficient evidence to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service showing that the town had already been residentially zoned and platted by Onslow County, was under development, and had a full complement of infrastructure in the ground prior to its erroneous inclusion in the Coastal Barrier Resource System (CBRS). Tuman emphasized that H.R. 187 follows the letter of the CBRA statute and accounts for areas of North Topsail Beach that were found by two federal government agencies to have been developed prior to the mapping. He stated, “My testimony is not about the healthy debate over human habitation of coastal barriers, the environmental impact of coastal barrier development, or the wisdom of shoreline protection and beach nourishment. My testimony and H.R. 187 is about the fair, equitable, and proper application of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act.”



The subcommittee hearing was the next step in the process to bring the bill to the House floor for a vote. The subcommittee adjourned after Chairman John Fleming stated that there may be more questions from the subcommittee members. 



Prepared Statement of Mayor Daniel Tuman before the House Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans and Insular Affairs — H.R. 187



April 8, 2014



“Mr. Chairman and members of this distinguished Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to



provide you with factual information in support of H.R. 187. Together with its Senate counterpart, S.



533, this bill corrects technical errors made in the original 1982 mapping and subsequent 1990



additions to the Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) unit L06 (North Topsail Beach). In



implementing the Act, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service mistakenly designated some of the northern



end of North Topsail Beach as a CBRA zone. H.R. 187 and our proposed revisions to the CBRS unit L06



will correct this erroneous designation while keeping the number of acres in the unit constant.



North Topsail Beach is a family oriented beach town. It was incorporated as a Town in 1990. We are



located between the Cities of Jacksonville NC and Wilmington NC. We are a rural area adjacent to a



Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, and many of our residents, property owners and day visitors have a



military connection. We are on Topsail Island which is a barrier island that has 26 miles of shoreline.



Topsail Island is home to three very popular and easily reached beach towns, North Topsail Beach to the



north, Surf City in the middle, and Topsail Beach to the south. Topsail Island is accessible by two bridges.



A swing‐bridge provides access to Surf City. North Topsail Beach is accessible from the mainland by way



of highway NC210 and a causeway, the Larry Walton Memorial Bridge. This bridge, built in the 1968, is a



very large structure, provides convenient access to Topsail Island and is responsible, in part, for the



island‐wide development of Topsail Island.



“The main issue plaguing North Topsail Beach is its erroneous inclusion into the CBRS’s unit L06. As you



know, CBRS areas are defined as “any undeveloped coastal barrier.” Thus, to be included in the CBRS,



an area must be undeveloped. In contrast to the statute, unit L06 was already residentially zoned and



platted by Onslow County, under development, and had a full complement of infrastructure in the



ground prior to its erroneous inclusion in the CBRS. If the intent of the John H Chafee Coastal Barrier



Resources Act was to identify and include undeveloped coastal areas within its restrictions to discourage



development, then the inclusion of unit L06 was an error from Day One.



“The presence of CBRS within North Topsail Beach is a hardship for owners of property in our area and a



financial burden for our Town. While most of the northern 7.25 miles of the Town are within CBRS,



there are pockets or small areas within this total area that are not. This has created numerous problems



for various property owners and their insurers and mortgage agents as to whether they are in or out of



the CBRS boundary and qualify or don’t qualify for NFIP (National Flood Insurance Program). Since most



mortgage companies and banks require the purchasers of property to also purchase flood insurance,



prospective buyers and sellers have had problems that sometimes never get resolved. Furthermore,



private flood insurance can be available at a very high price or may not be available at all. USFW maps



have not always clearly delineated the actual boundary lines and USFW has reported the need to draw



accurate maps and has asked Congress to fund this work. The Town has heard numerous stories from



owners who can’t sell their property because private flood insurance was either not available or because



it was so too expensive for potential buyers. For example, North Topsail Beach pays $33,000 in private



flood insurance premiums for its town hall which is a very modest building. Local insurance agents have



estimated that our premiums would be less than $10,000 under NFIP.



“In addition, there is a stigma related to CBRS. On the part of some people and groups there is the belief



that residing within a CBRS designated area is a hazard to both property and human life. Although there



is nothing in our local history that can offered as evidence that would support this notion, or anything in



the information that is compiled by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management that could



differentiate one part of the town from the other, the thought still exists among some. Consequently,



this attitude has caused division within the town on future plans and expenditures. Outside our town,



this has fostered the belief that with living on barrier islands, others are paying higher taxes to insure



and subsidize our frivolous lifestyle. To refute this claim, FEMA has told us and others that the coastal



NFIP program in North Carolina is a money maker not loser. We believe that, with the required building



codes and shoreline protection policy, disasters of the magnitude that occurred with Hurricane Sandy



can be avoided.



“The Town of North Topsail Beach has done extensive research to document the prior development of



the area. In essence, we did the research that the Fish and Wildlife Service said it did not have the time



or money to do, and we provided our substantial report to that agency in August of 2009 and



subsequently to this Subcommittee and its Senate counterpart. Among the facts we uncovered was



a 1983 finding by NOAA’s Office of Ocean and Coastal Risk Management that roads, a sewage



treatment plant and plans for residential development were already in place as far back as 1978. In



addition, a 1988 Department of the Interior Environmental Statement concluded that “substantial



public infrastructure (e.g. roads and utility lines) already existed at the time the units were placed in



the CBRS.” The dates of these conclusions are significant since one pre‐dates the original CBRA



designation and the other is prior to the modifications to the CBRS maps in 1990. It was in that year



that the Coastal Barrier Resources Act was amended to give Congress, and not the Fish & Wildlife



Service, the authority to make changes made to CBRA maps. What was called the 1990 Coastal



Barrier Improvement Act allowed for a conservation area “within the boundaries of an area



established under Federal, State or local law” to be designated as an “Other Protected Area” (OPA).



As a result, the Service added new sections of conservation lands within System Unit L06 but



erroneously failed to designate these areas as OPA. Additional areas of North Topsail Beach that



were previously validated by USFWS in 1982 as developed were also erroneously added to the



System. The 2000 Coastal Barrier Reauthorization Act (CBRRA) codified the criteria used to assess



the “level of infrastructure” when “undeveloped” coastal barriers are recommended for inclusion



in the System, and for reviewing a unit’s development status at the time of inclusion.



“H.R. 187 creates a new map for CBRS Unit L06. We propose that this new map removes 659 residentially



developed acres, 1.0 square miles, of North Topsail Beach from the CBRS designation. 2155 acres of



undeveloped and environmentally sensitive lands, North Topsail Beach’s Conservation District, remain



within CBRS Unit L06 and are reclassified as OPA (Otherwise Protected Areas). To offset the this land



removed from the CBRS zone and keep the unit L06 at 6,043.5 acres, the Town also recommends



expanding the boundaries of L06 to include the entire Town of North Topsail Beach (3929 acres) and



proposes adding 659 new acres to CBRS. Consequently, the total L06 CBRS acreage of 2,814 remains



unchanged with this legislation.



“Our proposal of no net loss of CBRA acreage is another example of our Town’s commitment to be a



responsible custodian of the environmentally fragile areas within its boundaries. We are indeed proud



of the policies and ordinances that control these areas. Of the 3929.0 total acres within North Topsail



Beach, 2,565.0 acres, 65% of the town’s land area, are classified as Conservation District. This district is



established to protect the floodplain, coastal waters and areas of environmental concern under the



North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). No residential development is allowed in this



area for both environmental and future sea level rise concerns. Residential development is only



permitted along the immediate higher elevation shoreline, with vegetative buffer zones isolating the



residential areas from the lower elevation, environmentally sensitive Conservation District along the



sound‐side of the island.



“In conclusion, this request is very important to all of us assembled here and there is something very



important at stake. Our affected citizens and property owners need to be told that finally they are being



treated fairly and equitably under the Law.



“Thank you Ladies and Gentlemen. On behalf of the Town of North Topsail Beach, I urge you to approve



H.R. 187.”